Implementing an Automated Button-Pressing Robotic Finger to Improve Patient Care and Occupational Safety

This abstract has open access
Abstract Description
Submission ID :
HAC875
Submission Type
Authors (including presenting author) :
Yip CHW, Chen PWW, Chan WCD, Lau M, Yue SYA, Ip WMK
Affiliation :
Occupational Therapy Department, Shatin Hospital
Introduction :
Ensuring clinical safety and work efficiency is essential in current daily practice. However, certain remedial devices lack computerized settings to control training repetitions, necessitating manual activation by therapists every few minutes. This process is time-consuming and decreases work efficiency. Not only does this disrupt the workflow, but it can also interrupt patients during their training. Additionally, some equipment control panels are positioned improperly, requiring staff to bend their trunks to press buttons, which is not ergonomic.
Objectives :
To address these issues and promote occupational health, we implemented an automated button-pressing robotic finger designed to enhance clinical safety and training efficiency. Utilizing a well-designed, commercially available robotic finger that is both easily accessible and cost-effective, this automated device can be installed on the equipment buttons. The system automatically activates remedial devices at pre-programmed intervals to meet training needs. This reduces the need for manual activation, allowing staff to focus more on patient care while ensuring training continuity for patients.
Methodology :
To evaluate the efficacy of the service enhancement, we conducted a survey among our colleagues. A tailor-made 5-point ordinal scale survey was designed, focusing on clinical service efficiency, physical strain, patient care, and clinical safety. We collected 20 responses from our colleagues. Additionally, we conducted qualitative interviews with patients regarding their training experiences.
Result & Outcome :
Preliminary findings from the survey reveal a significant reduction in the time required for manual activation, with an estimated savings of 10 minutes per session. 90% of staff affirmed that this change enhances work efficiency, while 90% reported a significant reduction in physical strain due to less frequent bending. Furthermore, 85% indicated that the robotic finger enables greater focus on patient care, and 85% believed it contributes to enhanced overall clinical safety. Additionally, patients reported better training continuity, benefiting from uninterrupted training sessions, which are essential for their rehabilitation.
In conclusion, the implementation of the automated button-pressing robotic finger represents a valuable improvement in our department. This service enhancement not only improves work efficiency and the quality of care provided to our patients but also reduces the risk of occupational injuries.
3 visits